So I had a great plan. I was going to read seven nonfiction books in a row after the book about Elizabeth the first, and then lug my seven
Harry Potter books off of my bookshelf and have a
Harry Potter frenzy. However when I walked into Analysis on Monday and saw Jacob Armando with his nose in
Socerer's Stone, I decided I couldn't wait. It's been since the last book came out that I've read all of them through. That was two years ago I guess which doesn't seem that long ago but it really is. (Plus today, September 1st I missed the Hogwarts Express seeing as I was in America asleep in bed when it pulled out of King's Cross, so I had to figure out someway to get there.)
So when I got home Monday I dug around in my sister's room to find my copy of the first book. I lent it to her because she's never read
Harry Potter. (Which I don't understand!) I opened it up and started reading. It was strange to be reading the first one again. I've never truly realized how different the first one was from the seventh one.
The first book starts out side of Harry's mind. With the Durselys who were "proud to say that they were perfectly normal. Thank you very much." I feel as though in the first book, and I'm not that far along yet, you hear more from the narrator then Harry himself, but as the books progress you hear more from Harry. Especially in the fifth book, he's always whining.
It's funny rereading this book because between seventh and eighth grade I wrote all over the first two chapter because I was inspired by internet speculation I guess and so along with the text I'm also reading my notes in the margins. I walked into Coach Fowlkes's class after lunch and Ian Banks was looking in my book. He asked me why I wrote in it. And I told him because I liked to. He thinks I'm really weird now, but I've done it kind of off and on since around seventh grade when we read
The Giver. Reese makes us underline, highlight and star things everyday in class. Dr. Snider said that she never reads without something to write with so I figure me and my margin writing habits are in good company. It's interesting though, in my copy of
Socerer's Stone I only wrote in the margins for the first three chapter because I got so into the story, which happens a lot. If I have a pen with me while I'm reading sometimes I'll write something or underline something if it's interesting...so that I can find it again with ease.
Well, I'm going to go read more now because Harry's only just got his wand...
P.S. The reason I titled this blog
Philosopher's Stone is because I don't understand why they changed then name for American publishing. I feel as if it's an insult saying that we won't understand something... after all it technically existed, at least in alchemist theory. I think I read a
Nancy Drew when I was younger... she was in France working on a case that had to do with Alchemists some how and the Philosopher's Stone was mentioned... I just don't understand.